Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Transparency at scale
Digital solutions for trust, resilience and sustainability: verifiable credentials in supply chains

other

Linktoparent


Project Details

Page properties
Domain
Project Identifier
Text Field
defaultexample: P1021
idpid
requiredtrue
P1122
Bureau Decision #
Text Field
defaultexample: P1021
idBureauDecision
requiredtrue
#2306056, #2309067, #2401007, #2404019
Project Proposal Status

SP Page Status
dateMar 09, 2018 12:14
hidetrue
width25%
userMalik
statusofficial

Project Page

Transparency at scale digital solutions for trust, resilience and sustainability: verifiable credentials in supply chains

Supporting VC
Project Lead
HoD Support
Text Field
defaultexample: EU / US / UN
idHodSupport
requiredtrue
RU, SL, IN
Status
Select2
defaultSelect the status for this project
idproject_status
requiredtrue
selectedIn development
  • Initiated
  • In development
  • Completed
Version
Text Field
defaultClick to set the version number
idversion_number
requiredtrue
1.0
Submitted date
Date Picker
defaultClick to set the submissions date
idsubmitted_date
requiredtrue
2023-05-08
Draft Development Completion
Date Picker
defaultDraft Development date
idDraft
2024-05-31
Publication Date
Date Picker
defaultExit date
idExit
2024-06-30

Relevant SDG targets:

As a framework for globally scalable supply chain transparency that supports any ESG criteria imposed on any product by either an ESG standard or a regulation, Recommendation 49 targets

  • SDG 6 – Clean water and sanitation
  • SDG 7 – Affordable & clean energy
  • SDG 8 – Decent work and economic growth
  • SDG 11 – Sustainable cities and communities
  • SDG 12 – Responsible consumption & production
  • SDG 13 – Climate action
  • SDG 14 – Life below water
  • SDG 15 – Life on land

Project Purpose

 As regulatory and consumer pressures drive up demand (and justify premium prices) for sustainable goods, so the commercial incentive to make fake sustainability claims will increase.  

  • EC investigation2 : 59% of environmental claims had no evidence and 42% were deemed false or deceptive.
  • Fast Company3: 68% of executives admit their company is guilty of greenwashing.
  • Survey4: 78% of consumers believe that companies should be environmentally responsible and are willing to pay premiums for confidence in those claims.

At COP 27, Secretary General Guterres clearly stated that the UN has : “Zero Tolerance for Greenwashing”5There is already a significant difference between consumer expectation and market Behaviour.  There are two plausible pathways out:

The UN/CEFACT mission of “digital standards for sustainable supply chains” provides ideal positioning for this recommendation to nations that aims to make fake claims hard and therefore drive industry to compete in a “race to the top” where commercial motivations exist for stronger and strong evidence of sustainable products.

Building on UNECE Rec#466 which defined standard processes and data structures for textile & leather traceability & transparency and guided by principles in the VC white paper7, this new recommendation will provide guidance for nations on scaling traceability, transparency and trust in supply chains so that unsustainable practices have nowhere to hide.

  1. https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/high-level_expert_group_n7b.pdf
  2. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_269
  3. https://www.fastcompany.com/90740501/68-of-u-s-execs-admit-their-companies-are-guilty-of-greenwashing
  4. https://blog.gitnux.com/greenwashing-statistics/
  5. https://www.un.org/en/delegate/%E2%80%98zero-tolerance-greenwashing%E2%80%99-guterres-says-report-launch
  6. https://unece.org/trade/traceability-sustainable-garment-and-footwear
  7. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2022-09/WhitePaper_VerifiableCredentials-CBT.pdf

Project Scope

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_scope
This project will deliver a new UNECE recommendation document that will provide guidance to nations on the implementation of scalable supply chain traceability, transparency and trust frameworks that will enhance sustainability and resilience.

Project Deliverables

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_deliverables
Deliverable 1 - Policy Recommendation
Deliverable 2 - Technical Specification
Deliverable 3 - Guidelines

Exit Criteria

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idexit_criteria
Deliverable 1 & 2: Public Review logs demonstrating all comments have been satisfactorily resolved; Final document ready for publication.
Deliverable 3: Final document ready for publication.

Impact analysis

Regulators : Combat greenwashing and uplift export market access.

Industry: Meet supply chain due diligence obligations for you and your customers.

Certifiers : Provide digitally verifiable trust of ESG compliance.

Software Providers : Empower your customers to participate in sustainable digitised supply chains.


Successful impact is measured by uptake metrics by each of the stakeholder categories above. The recommendation will seek commitment via a sustainability pledge and then will track successful implementations via a self-service implementation test & verification tool. Uptake targets are based on existing 100+ sustainability pledges received for the textile & leather traceability program.

Stakeholder

Implementations pledged / completed by years after publication

Year

2024

2025

2026

2028

2034

Regulators

10 / 0

20 / 10

50 / 20

100 / 50

250 / 200

Industry

50 / 5

200 / 20

1000 / 250

10,000 / 3,000

100,000 / 50,000

Certifiers

20 / 1

50 / 20

100 / 50

200 / 100

500 / 300

Software

20 / 5

50 / 20

100 / 50

200 / 100

500 / 300

Project Team Membership and Required Functional Expertise

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_membership
Membership is open to UN/CEFACT experts with broad knowledge in the area of: Supply chain sustainability & resilience. Verifiable Credentials & the web of trust,
  
In addition, Heads of Delegations may invite technical experts from their constituency to participate in the work. Experts are expected to contribute to the work based solely on their expertise and to comply with the UN/CEFACT Code of Conduct and Ethics and the policy on Intellectual Property Rights.

Geographical Focus

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idgeographical_focus
The geographical focus of the project is global.

Beneficiaries

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idgeographical_focus
For developing economies : low cost of adoption, paper-friendly digital processes.

Initial Contributions

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idinitial_contributions
The following contributions are submitted as part of this proposal. It is understood that these contributions are only for consideration by the Project Team and that other participants may submit additional contributions in order to ensure that as much information as possible is obtained from those with expertise and a  material interest in the project. It is also understood that the Project Team may choose to adopt one or more of these contributions “as is”.

This project builds upon work already completed by UNECE and partner organisations.

Resource Requirements

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idresource_requirements
Participants in the project shall provide resources for their own participation. The existence and functioning of the project shall not require any additional resources from the UNECE secretariat

Note that additional secretariat resources may be required or this project (community engagement, specialist advice, implementation testing) however these additional resources will be funded via contributions from some project member organisations (government & commercial).

Any additional request:	Engagement of the Team of Specialists.

Project Proposal Files

Attachments
oldfalse