| Submitted date | Last Update Date | Version | Status | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
This project’s purpose is to update the UN/CEFACT Recommendation No. 1 “UN Layout Key for Trade Documents” as well as its “Guidelines for Application”. Recommendation 1 provides an international basis for the standardization of documents used in international trade and transport and for visual display representations of such documents. Recommendation 1 was first published in 1973 and the current recommendation text dates from 1981. Recommendation 1 has been supplemented by guidelines and informative annexes in the early 2000s. The guidelines added to Rec. 1 provide, among other content, a very important number of examples. At this time, the two texts read as two separate documents: the recommended practice and the guidelines for application. |
The present project proposal will consolidate existing material into a single set of guidelines with supporting annexes, moving many of the examples to an informative case-study repository. This will provide an updated package of this recommendation which will further facilitate the smooth flow of information in domestic and international trade. Creating sets of aligned documents was a core subject of the 1981 revision of the Recommendation No. 1; this will be enhanced within this revision. Furthermore, within the past ten years, information communication technologies (ICTs) have seen rapid developments which have provided a momentum to move from paper-based trade documentation to electronic equivalents. The future revised Recommendation No. 1 will address both the paper-based documents as well as their electronic equivalents. |
The project deliverables are: a) Revised Recommendation on UN Layout Key for Trade Documents. b) Revised Guidelines for Application c) Repository of relevant examples (will be an ongoing work after the project) |
Revised recommendation and guidelines – revised recommendation text and guideline text are ready for publishing & external review log showing that all serious comments have been considered. |
DELIVERABLE NAME | Project Inception | Expected Completion Date | Requirements Gathering | Expected Completion Date | Draft Development | Expected Completion Date | Public Review | Expected Completion Date | Project Exit | Expected Completion Date | Publication | Expected Completion Date | Maintenance | Expected Completion Date | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
