Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Canonical Model

other

Linktoparent

Submitted dateLast Update Date

Project Details

Page properties
Domain
Project Identifier
Text Field
defaultexample: P1021
idpid
requiredtrue
P1052
Bureau Decision #
Text Field
defaultexample: P1021
idBureauDecision
requiredtrue
#1709031
Version
Project Proposal Status

SP Page Status
dateMar 09, 2018 12:14
hidetrue
width25%
userMalik
statusofficial

Project Page

Canonical Model

Supporting VC
Project Lead
HoD Support
form-
date
textfield-macro
default
Click to set the submissions date
example: EU / US / UN
id
submitted_date
HodSupport
requiredtrue
2017-07-24
N/A
Status
form-
date
select2-macro
default
Click to set the latest update date
Select the status for this project
id
latest_updated_date2017-07-20
project_status
requiredtrue
selectedCompleted
  • Initiated
  • In development
  • Completed
Version
Text Field
defaultClick to set the version number
idversion_number
requiredtrue
1
SP Page Status
dateAug 07, 2017 11:38
hidetrue
width25%
userLaThompson
statusofficial

Comment

Insert here a link to the project page using the brackets [   ]

p1052

 

 

2.0
Submitted date
Date Picker
defaultClick to set the submissions date
idsubmitted_date
requiredtrue
2017-07-24
Draft Development Completion
Date Picker
defaultDraft Development date
idDraft
2018-02-01
Publication Date
Date Picker
defaultExit date
idExit
2018-05-01

Project Purpose

  Excerpt
Excerpt

Project purpose

The project’s purpose is to address the now globally recognised importance of the role of canonical process and data models in facilitating trade. Given UN/CEFACT’s current global recognition as a proven and effective standards developer, the development of such a canonical mode is considered to be UN/CEFACT’s number one opportunity.

The project will draw on UN/CEFACT’s sound foundations and current progress to date in the development of such a canonical model and proceed to develop guidelines to assist all working groups engaged in the development of UN/CEFACT standards and recommendations to contribute effectively to the delivery of the required canonical model.

Info
titleWhat does “canonical” mean?

(adj.) Authoritative or standard: conforming to an accepted rule or procedure. When referring to programming, canonical means conforming to well-established patterns or rules. The term is typically used to describe whether or not a programming interface follows the already established standard.

The opportunity & the driving forces

UN/CEFACT is poised to significantly contribute to:

  • Blockchain enabled “Trust” applied to the supply chain
  • Internet enabled “Collaboration” applied to the supply chain “Data Pipeline”
  • The uptake of process driven as distinct to document driven supply chains as required to gain benefit from blockchain and IoT technologies, and in support of “Event Driven Architectures” based services
  • Deployment of UN/CEFACT’s Reference Data Model approach

To deliver UN/CEFACT must now focus on processes and choreography moving beyond primarily focussing only on message definition.

Project

Scopeproject_
Text Area
default<click here to edit>
id

scope

The

project

will

examine

all

current

UN/CEFACT

deliverables

covering

BRS;

RSM;

ISCRM;

CCL:

SCRDM

&

MMT-RDM;

MA

&

schema.

Based

on

the

existing

UMM

(2003)

and

CCTS

(2003)

both

designed

to

ensure

that

UN/CEFACT

works

to

the

delivery

of

the

required

canonical

model,

and

in

considering

newer

technologies,

an

analysis

will

be

conducted

to

determine

the

extent

to

which

modernization

may

be

required

of

the

base

UN/CEFACT

instruments

and

methods.

Preliminary

assessment

and

experience

dating

back

to

2002

indicates

that

to

original

developers

of

the

UN/CEFACT

instruments

UMM

&

CCTS

held

great

insight

into

the

directions

of

future

technologies

including

blockchain

and

sensor

technology.

The

project

will

assess

any

identifiable

gap

in

existing

instruments,

tools

and

methods,

make

recommendations

as

to

how

to

address,

and

then

to

develop

guidelines

to

ensure

that

the

opportunity

to

use

to

greater

purpose

in

particular

UMM

and

related

artifacts

is

addressing

the

global

move

to

Event

Driven

Architectures

applied

to

software

based

business

solutions.

This

project

may

result

in

subsequent

projects

where

technical

specifications

may

need

to

be

updated

to

the

latest

technologies.

Project Deliverables

Text Areadefault<click here to edit>idproject_deliverables

The

project

deliverables

are:

• Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables. • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development

  • Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables.
  • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards
  • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema
  • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development

Exit Criteria

The exit criteria will be:

  • Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables.
    • Analysis and recommendations presented to the Bureau for Project Exit
  • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards
    • Report presented to the Bureau for Project Exit
  • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema
    • Guideline presented to the Bureau and intended to be circulated to all Domains and eventually published on the website for future usage guidance.
  • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development
    • Guide presented to the Bureau and intended to be presented to the Plenary for information and published on the

Exit Criteria

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idexit_criteria
The exit criteria will be: • Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables. o Analysis and recommendations presented to the Bureau for Project Exit • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards o Report presented to the Bureau for Project Exit • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema o Guideline presented to the Bureau and intended to be circulated to all Domains and eventually published on the website for future usage guidance. • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development o Guide presented to the Bureau and intended to be presented to the Plenary for information and published on the
    • website.

Project Team Membership and Required Functional Expertise

Text Areadefault<click here to edit>idproject_membership

The

project

team

is

open

to

experts

with

broad

knowledge

and

experience

in

the

area

of

supply

chain

and

related

activities

as

well

as

in

modelling

techniques.

In

addition,

Heads

of

Delegations

may

invite

technical

experts

from

their

constituency

to

participate

in

the

work.

Experts

are

expected

to

contribute

to

the

work

based

solely

on

their

expertise

and

to

comply

with

the

UN/CEFACT

Code

of

Conduct

and

Ethics.

Head of Delegation Support

Text Areadefault<click here to edit>

idhead_of_delegation

HoD

support

not

required

for

internal

/

communication

deliverables.

Geographical Focus

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idgeographical_focus

The

geographical

focus

is

global.

Initial Contributions

Text Areadefault<click here to edit>idinitial_contributions

  • UN/CEFACT
  • Modelling
  • Methodology
  • (CEFACT/TMG/N093)
  • UN/CEFACT
  • ebXML
  • Core
  • Components
  • Technical
  • Specification
  • Version
  • 2.01
  • UN/EDIFACT
  • Data
  • element
  • directory
  • D.16A
• BRS and RSM Templates
  • BRS and RSM Templates

Resource Requirements

No additional secretariat resources will

Resource Requirements

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idresource_requirements
No additional secretariat resources will

required.

Project Leadership

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_leadership
Proposed Project Leader. Tat Tsen Jonathon Koh

Milestones

 

Proposed Project Leader: Jonathan Tat Tsen KOH

Restrict Content
anonymoushide
usersMalik

Milestones

DELIVERABLE NAME

Project

Inception

Expected Completion Date

Requirements

Gathering

Expected Completion Date

Draft

Development

Expected Completion Date

Public

Review

Expected Completion Date

Project

Exit

Expected Completion Date

Publication

Expected Completion Date

Maintenance

Expected Completion Date

Text Field
default<click here to edit>
iddeliverable_name1
Gap analysis, report, guidelines, Executive Guide
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp1
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp1
2017-09-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp2
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp2
2017-11-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp3
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp3
2018-02-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp4
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp4
2018-04-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp5
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp5
2018-05-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp6
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp6
2018-05-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp7
selectedNO
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp7
 

Project Proposal Files

Attachments
oldfalse