Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Revision of Recommendation 2

other

Linktoparent

Project Details

Page properties
Domain
Project Identifier
Text Field
defaultexample: P1021
idpid
requiredtrue
P1106
Bureau Decision #
Text Field
defaultexample: P1021
idBureauDecision
requiredtrue
#2109032
Project Proposal Status

SP Page Status
dateMar 09, 2018 12:14
hidetrue
width25%
userMalik
statusofficial

Project Page

Revision of Recommendation 2

Supporting VC
Project Lead
HoD Support
Text Field
defaultexample: EU / US / UN
idHodSupport
requiredtrue
yes
Status
Select2
defaultSelect the status for this project
idproject_status
requiredtrue
selectedIn development
  • Initiated
  • In development
  • Completed
Version
Text Field
defaultClick to set the version number
idversion_number
requiredtrue
1.0
Submitted date
Date Picker
defaultClick to set the submissions date
idsubmitted_date
requiredtrue
2021-09-06
Draft Development Completion
Date Picker
defaultDraft Development date
idDraft
2021-10-10
Publication Date
Date Picker
defaultExit date
idExit
2022-01-30

Project Purpose

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_purpose
UNECE Recommendation n°2 was originally approved at the same time as UNECE Recommendation n°1 on the United Nations Layout Key and underlined the importance of clearly defining the information in documents and using code lists as much as possible in order to facilitate mutual understanding. It was quickly integrated into the UN Layout Key. However, this message is equally important in electronic data exchanges and finds its pertinence in today’s digitalized environment.
Ensuring that all parties understand the same information in the same way is perhaps even more pertinent today as multiple data exchange methods are emerging. The semantic meaning – or the base meaning – of each individual data element, whether it be on a paper document or within an electronic message, needs to be clearly defined and understood by all parties involved in order to avoid errors, miscomprehension, misalignment or non-interoperability. 

The importance of this topic is further accentuated by the World Trade Organization’s Trade Facilitation Agreement in its article 10.3 on the use of international standards. The reason that international standards are proposed in such an agreement is rightly to ensure interoperability and effective data exchange, especially in an electronic environment.

Project Scope

Outline the importance of codes, code lists and semantics as used within the UN/CEFACT environment. Describe the process of digitization (document centric) and dematerialization (process-driven) and how this is approached within the UN/CEFACT environment.

Build upon the International Supply Chain Reference Model (ISCRM) and propose a pre-Buy phase and a post-Pay phase in order to address issues of sustainable consumption.

Outline within the recommendation and its annex the key semantic anchors within UN/CEFACT.

Provide a list in annex of all code lists which are developed, maintained and published by UN/CEFACT (either as recommendations or integrated within UN/EDIFACT or other syntax).


Project Deliverables

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_deliverables
The project deliverable:
     •	A revised Recommendation 2.

Exit Criteria

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idexit_criteria
The exit criteria will be:
     • A revised Recommendation 2 ready for publication and the comment log from its Public Review demonstrating how all comments have been addressed.

Project Team Membership and Required Functional Expertise

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idproject_membership
Membership is  open to UN/CEFACT experts with broad knowledge in the area of: Semantics, UN/CEFACT recommendations, ISCRM.
In addition, Heads of Delegations may invite technical experts from their constituency to participate in the work.
Experts are expected to contribute to the work based solely on their expertise and to comply with the UN/CEFACT Code of Conduct and Ethics and the policy on Intellectual Property Rights

Geographical Focus

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idgeographical_focus
The geographical focus of the project is global.

Initial Contributions

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idinitial_contr
• International Supply Chain Reference Model, 2001
• Reference Data Models and all UN/CEFACT e-business standard BRS
• UNECE Recommendation 34 on Data Simplification and Standardization for International Trade
• UNECE Code List Recommendations (3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 28)
• UN/EDIFACT Code Lists

Resource Requirements

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idresource_requirements
Participants in the project shall provide resources for their own participation. The existence and functioning of the project shall not require any additional resources from the UNECE secretariat


Project Proposal Files

Attachments
oldfalse