NOTES

WH

1

2

5

BRS + RSM templates

• Feedback on continued use and purpose
• Suggestions for improvement 

The use of BRS and RSM has differed across the domains. 

BRS is tool independent. The intended use of both frameworks is that users complete the BRS first and develop the RSM based on defined specifications.  

However, in practice there has been a mismatch between data and requirements and each cycle has generated new data libraries.

Ian 

5

Elevator pitch

• Review key concepts
• Background and relevance of UMM 
• Suggested contents
• List of reference/ background documents to prepare the elevator pitch

A wiki/ discussion thread will be set up to generate discussion for the elevator pitch as preparation for the forum.

Ian

Anita

5

Baseline of existing deliverables

• Updates to existing spreadsheet
• Discussion regarding a survey with each domain to collect data on:
  • Tools used to deliver each published standard, recommendation, etc.
  • Request recommendations and suggestions 

 A suggestion was made to develop a proposal for the spreadsheet to address the following questions:

• how was the spreadsheet was created?
• Are there any gaps – quality and quantity of data?
• Where are the EAP files?

Ian

1

Planned forum activities

• Develop the 2019-2020 Programme of Work across all domains

Forum opening slides are due Oct 10.

Ian

• Suggested conference call during the forum, see below
• 2 week schedule will resume after the forum
• Regular meeting cadence– 28 Aug 1pm LA+10pm Geneva+ 29 Aug 6am Melbourne 

Calls will resume after the October forum

Rajiv

Topic for next call: 

• should we tweak the canonical data model project?
• With which tools and methods was the BRS created?
• How are artefacts and produced and tools used in the BRS+RSM frameworks?