UN/CEFACT Public Information

Space shortcuts

Page tree

Versions Compared

Old Version 29

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (malik)

Saved on

compared with

New Version 30

changes.mady.by.user Unknown User (malik)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

 

Canonical Model

other

Linktoparent

Submitted date

Last Update Date

Version

Project Proposal Status

Project Page

Date Picker
defaultClick to set the submissions date
idsubmitted_date
requiredtrue
2017-07-24

 

 

Date Picker
defaultClick to set the latest update date
idlatest_updated_date
2017-07-20

 

 

Text Field
defaultClick to set the version number
idversion_number
requiredtrue
1

 

 

SP Page Status
dateAug 07, 2017 11:38
hidetrue
width25%
userLaThompson
statusofficial

Comment

Insert here a link to the project page using the brackets [   ]

p1052

 

 

 

Excerpt

Project purpose

The project’s purpose is to address the now globally recognised importance of the role of canonical process and data models in facilitating trade. Given UN/CEFACT’s current global recognition as a proven and effective standards developer, the development of such a canonical mode is considered to be UN/CEFACT’s number one opportunity.

The project will draw on UN/CEFACT’s sound foundations and current progress to date in the development of such a canonical model and proceed to develop guidelines to assist all working groups engaged in the development of UN/CEFACT standards and recommendations to contribute effectively to the delivery of the required canonical model.

Info
titleWhat does “canonical” mean?

(adj.) Authoritative or standard: conforming to an accepted rule or procedure. When referring to programming, canonical means conforming to well-established patterns or rules. The term is typically used to describe whether or not a programming interface follows the already established standard.

The opportunity & the driving forces

UN/CEFACT is poised to significantly contribute to:

  • Blockchain enabled “Trust” applied to the supply chain
  • Internet enabled “Collaboration” applied to the supply chain “Data Pipeline”
  • The uptake of process driven as distinct to document driven supply chains as required to gain benefit from blockchain and IoT technologies, and in support of “Event Driven Architectures” based services
  • Deployment of UN/CEFACT’s Reference Data Model approach

To deliver UN/CEFACT must now focus on processes and choreography moving beyond primarily focussing only on message definition.

Project scope

The project will examine all current UN/CEFACT deliverables covering BRS; RSM; ISCRM; CCL: SCRDM & MMT-RDM; MA & schema.

Based on the existing UMM (2003) and CCTS (2003) both designed to ensure that UN/CEFACT works to the delivery of the required canonical model, and in considering newer technologies, an analysis will be conducted to determine the extent to which modernization may be required of the base UN/CEFACT instruments and methods. Preliminary assessment and experience dating back to 2002 indicates that to original developers of the UN/CEFACT instruments UMM & CCTS held great insight into the directions of future technologies including blockchain and sensor technology.

The project will assess any identifiable gap in existing instruments, tools and methods, make recommendations as to how to address, and then to develop guidelines to ensure that the opportunity to use to greater purpose in particular UMM and related artifacts is addressing the global move to Event Driven Architectures applied to software based business solutions. This project may result in subsequent projects where technical specifications may need to be updated to the latest technologies.

Project Deliverables

Text Areadefault<click here to edit>idproject_deliverables

The

project

deliverables

are:

• Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables. • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development

  • Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables.
  • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards
  • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema
  • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development

Exit Criteria

The exit criteria will be:

  • Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables.
    • Analysis and recommendations presented to the Bureau for Project Exit
  • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards
    • Report presented to the Bureau for Project Exit
  • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema
    • Guideline presented to the Bureau and intended to be circulated to all Domains and eventually published on the website for future usage guidance.
  • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development
    • Guide presented to the Bureau and intended to be presented to the Plenary for information and published on the

Exit Criteria

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idexit_criteria
The exit criteria will be: • Gap analysis and recommendations with respect to any ‘modernization’ required of existing instruments, methods or deliverables. o Analysis and recommendations presented to the Bureau for Project Exit • Report on the current and proposed use of tools, both commercial and bespoke as deployed in the work of developing UN/CEFACT recommendations and standards o Report presented to the Bureau for Project Exit • Development of Guidelines for extended/deeper use of UMM, CCTS and resultant BRS, RSM, ISCRM, SCRDM, MMT-RDM, CCL, schema o Guideline presented to the Bureau and intended to be circulated to all Domains and eventually published on the website for future usage guidance. • Executive guide material suited to communication of the UN/CEFACT capability in standards development o Guide presented to the Bureau and intended to be presented to the Plenary for information and published on the
    • website.

Project Team Membership and Required Functional Expertise

Text Areadefault<click here to edit>

idproject_membership
The project team is open to experts with broad knowledge and experience in the area of supply chain and related activities as well as in modelling techniques. 
In addition, Heads of Delegations may invite technical experts from their constituency to participate in the work. Experts are expected to contribute to the work based solely on their expertise and to comply with the UN/CEFACT Code of Conduct and Ethics.

Head of Delegation Support

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idhead_of_delegation

HoD

support

not

required

for

internal

/

communication

deliverables.

Geographical Focus

Text Area
default<click here to edit>
idgeographical_focus

The

geographical

focus

is

global.

Initial Contributions

form-textarea-macro

default<click here to edit>
idinitial_contributions
•
  • UN/CEFACT
  • Modelling
  • Methodology
  • (CEFACT/TMG/N093)
•
  • UN/CEFACT
  • ebXML
  • Core
  • Components
  • Technical
  • Specification
  • Version
  • 2.01
•
  • UN/EDIFACT
  • Data
  • element
  • directory
  • D.16A
• BRS and RSM Templates
  • BRS and RSM Templates

Resource Requirements

No additional secretariat resources will required.

Project Leadership

Proposed Project Leader: Jonathan Tat Tsen KOH

Milestones

 

DELIVERABLE NAME

Project

Inception

Expected Completion Date

Requirements

Gathering

Expected Completion Date

Draft

Development

Expected Completion Date

Public

Review

Expected Completion Date

Project

Exit

Expected Completion Date

Publication

Expected Completion Date

Maintenance

Expected Completion Date

Text Field
default<click here to edit>
iddeliverable_name1
Gap analysis, report, guidelines, Executive Guide
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp1
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp1
2017-09-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp2
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp2
2017-11-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp3
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp3
2018-02-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp4
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp4
2018-04-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp5
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp5
2018-05-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp6
selectedYES
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp6
2018-05-01
Select2
defaultSELECT
idyesno_odp7
selectedNO
  • YES
  • NO
Date Picker
defaultNO DATE SELECTED
idexpdate_odp7
 

Project Proposal Files

Attachments
oldfalse

© United Nations Economic Commission for Europe | Trade Division | UN/CEFACT

 

UNECE Staff members are authorized to login with their network credentials (i.e. login/pwd to access their Desktop computer)


Access to this system is restricted to members of UN/CEFACT Community only : UNECE Staff, UN/CEFACT Bureau, Heads of Delegations, Domain Coordinators and UN/CEFACT Experts. All information contained in or obtained from this system is to be used exclusively for UN/CEFACT official purposes. In proceeding, the user agrees to comply with all UN/CEFACT Policies, Procedures and Terms of Reference and with the UN/CEFACT Code of Conduct.