back to 

Date

Attendees



Goals

  • Going through the feedbacks for MLETR draft Outline (draft ToC Version 0.1) from UN/CEFACT Experts.

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
20minToC item 1
  • Aljosja clarified his comments were to put in a study of failed projects.
  • Kay suggested to put it under 11. Case Studies.
  • Sue mentioned some considerations eg. how far back and how big the section.
  • Lance suggested for case studies to be done in questionnaire form so it will be standardised, and to have a minimum of 4 case studies from different companies, to prevent any show of endorsement.
  • Lance reminded that where companies are mentioned, UN/CEFACT will need agreement from the mentioned organisation for the information to be published.
  • Hanane suggested to add stats.
  • Kay summarised to put the Lessons learnt in annex under Case Studies.
24minToC item 3
  • Luca clarified that railway consignment notes cannot be used as collateral for financing as it is non-negotiable.
  • Consensus is to focus on title transfer aspect of negotiable bill of lading.


3minToC item 4
  • Kay summarised will note down Aljosja’s comments and when the inputs come in, we could put it where it flows.
4minToC item 5Simone Lamont-Black
  • Consensus on “e. Switch between Paper and electronic record” and digital Bill of lading.
5minToC item 6
  • Aljosja clarified “Proof of identity” wording comes from blockchain concepts, but these requirements could apply to non-blockchain system.
  • Sue seconded that if doing this electronically, we have to bring in the trust framework, legal framework, identity considerations to make sure the same thing can happen (vs Paper Bill of lading).

Action items

  • Kay shared an updated draft ToC : document
  • Additional inputs could be sent to Kay (workkay999@gmail.com)
  • Everyone to start exploring on which area/s you are interested to contribute on.
  • Next conference call, in 3 weeks’ time (Week of 15-Jun-2020), to continue going through the feedbacks for MLETR draft Outline.
  •